By Rolf Krake
I started to get curious about taqaya when I watched this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tqtpfq6OJ9A
One can ask the question if the 'silent majority' or moderate muslims is a group that wishes to benefit or take advantage from not taking sides.
But something in Islam is a tool, as directed to muslims in the quran and Sunna, it's part of Al Taqqaya, it's a way and a tool to support Jihad and the conversion of infidels to Islam and deception of the infidel and even fellow muslims not to see the real islam untill the moment they are strong in their faith to without question even turning gainst their own if in their way.
We need to expose and understand the secrets and hidden hatred within the muslim seeking to immigrate or infiltrate in their 'environments' and cities in our coutries and who preach the same speak against our values, like Democracy and our way of life, and to create diversion, and plant the seeds of discord and sedition.
The quran tells muslims that they are to emigrate to a country targeted for conquest/conversion.
We are to a bigger extend being painfully aware muslims separate themselves.
We can not know for sure the intentions, but we can judge actions and try to analyze.
While not all muslim are terrorists and under-miners of our democracy, they are all Muslims.
When the muslim talks about peace and love, there is no compulsion in religion and all the other apologist blabber it is Taqaya, when he tells you terrorism is un-islamic and that his religion prohibit from 'hurting' others religion, it is Taqaya.
How often do we not hear this blabber from muslims calling themselves moderate, even agreeing with a little... but, the 'but' followed with an apologist deception
Many a muslim rejects the notion of democracy as practiced in the Occident and points to inability of Islam to co-exist with our form of government.
Things like rejecting the equality of women, intolerance towards other religions, the lack of will or inability to condemn acts abhorrent
to normal people like suicide bombers, female genital mutilation, despotism, beheadings, terrorism, slavery by muslims in Africa (Sudan) etc.
Moderate muslims - there is no precise definition for them - are either cowering from the extremists or they are slyly coy, deceptive.
There is also a presumption of collective guilt which is strange to us, hence the demand that we must apologize not for what we did but what others have done and we are all guilty.
Regardless of the fact muslim media or leaders may have expressed regret in the media or country if they do such thing, it doesn't matter or drowned out in propaganda.
Their demand seems to be an apology directed personally to them.
We are being asked to perform public penance, as in the Middle Ages.
It seems behind the thin wall of modernity and rhetoric of human rights and democracy lurks the same old primitive beast - Fascism or rather Islamic Fascism which is worse and fundamental more core evil.
One of the major aims but of course denied, as well as the word 'kaffir' is not offending at all, another lie.
Jizya:
A blood ransom Qur’anic poll-tax (based on Qur’an sura [chapter] 9, verse 29), levied traditionally on non-Muslims vanquished by jihad, and forced to live under Islamic Law (the Shari’a). Under the Sharia’s regulations, either the non-Muslim infidels must convert to Islam, or they pay the jizya—classically, in a humiliating public ceremony which often involved blows to the head or neck—and their life and belongings are protected. The nature of such “protection” is clarified in this definition of jizya by the seminal Arabic lexicographer, E.W. Lane, based on a careful analysis of the etymology of the term:
The tax that is taken from the free non-Muslim subjects of a Muslim government whereby they ratify the compact that assures them protection, as though it were compensation for not being slain The “contract of the “jizya”, or “dhimma” encompassed other obligatory and recommended obligations for the conquered non-Muslim “dhimmi” peoples. Collectively, these “obligations” formed the discriminatory system of dhimmitude imposed upon non-Muslims – Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, Hindus, and Buddhists – subjugated by jihad. Some of the more salient features of dhimmitude include: the prohibition of arms for the vanquished non-Muslims (dhimmis); the prohibnition of church bells; restrictions concerning the building and restoration of churches, synagogues, and temples; inequality between Muslims and non-Muslims with regard to taxes and penal law; the refusal of dhimmi testimony by Muslim courts; a requirement that Jews, Christians, and other non-Muslims, including Zoroastrians and Hindus, wear special clothes; and the overall humiliation and abasement of non-Muslims.
Kitman:
A related term of "taqiyya" with broader application, which is defined as “mental reservation.” An example of “Taqiyya” would be the insistence of a Muslim apologist that “of course” there is freedom of conscience in Islam, and then quoting that Qur’anic verse — “There shall be no compulsion in religion.” But the impression given will be false, for there has been no mention of the Muslim doctrine of abrogation, or naskh, whereby such an early verse as that about “no compulsion in religion” has been cancelled out by later, far more intolerant and malevolent verses. In any case, history shows that within Islam there is, and always has been, “compulsion in religion” for Muslims, and for non-Muslims.
The “compulsion” for Muslims comes from the treatment of apostasy as an act punishable by death. And though “dhimmis” are allowed to practice their religion, they do so under conditions of such burdens and restrictions that many, not as an act of conscience but rather as a response to inexorable Muslim pressure, have converted (or “reverted”) to Islam. Also, close to “taqiyya,” but rather than outright dissimulation, it consists in telling only a part of the truth, with “mental reservation” justifying the omission of the rest. One example may suffice. When a Muslim maintains that “jihad” really means “a spiritual struggle,” and fails to add that this definition is a recent one in Islam (little more than a century old), he misleads by holding back, and is practicing “kitman.”
When he adduces, in support of this doubtful proposition, the hadith in which Muhammad, returning home from one of his many battles, is reported to have said (as known from a chain of transmitters, or isnad), that he had returned from “the Lesser Jihad to the Greater Jihad” and does not add what he also knows to be true, that this is a “weak” hadith, regarded by the most-respected muhaddithin as of doubtful authenticity, he is further practicing “kitman.”
Above posts on Jizia and kitman, the relation of Taqaya:
http://justgrits.wordpress.com/glossary-of/
An absolute must read on Taqaya;
Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries
http://www.geocities.com/bharatvarsha1947/January_2003/destroykafirs.htm
Taqiyya and the Myth of Moderate Islam
http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/3518
An example of Kitman
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/004939.php
A chilling example of Al-Taqaya
http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=7553
Explaination's of Taqaya in Shia and actual definition
http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/creed_of_shia_explained/en/chap7.php
Interesting truths behind the deception of the infidel
http://debate.domini.org/newton/tolerance.html
The Islamic agenda and uses of deception.
http://answering-islam.org.uk/Terrorism/agenda.html
Hezbollywood
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/08/10/hezbollywood/
taqiyya: in Arabic, claiming to believe in one thing while really believing something else; hypocrisy
"Islamists like Akkari (the Danish Imam starting cartoon madness) are quintessential practitioners of taqiyya (dissimulation), for infidels are never owed the truth."
No comments:
Post a Comment